Just do it. Walk.

Mixed use path in Copenhagen

Congratulations! If you live in Copenhagen, Amsterdam or Portland, Oregon, you are in one of the world’s most bike-friendly cities. If you’re a bicycle commuter in one of these lovely towns, or others where bicycling is popular, you may glow with a little inner smugness. If you are one of many who drive to work or to run your errands, or who live where bicycling just doesn’t seem practical, you are not alone. Still, you may be feeling a little peer pressure. You may have a bicycling colleague who bounces into the office with healthy, rosy, rain-misted cheeks. You may see shoppers in the aisles of your local stores carrying handy bike baskets and dangling bike helmets conspicuously, buying healthy bananas and energy bars. Their presence makes you and your car in the parking lot, even if it’s a fuel-efficient hybrid, feel guilty, like every step you take is leaving a giant, sooty, carbon footprint. Maybe you should give up the car, get the bike out of the cellar and become One of Them. My advice? Resist.

I’m a bicycle commuter myself, but I’m the first to admit, it’s a tough transition. First, there’s the stuff. Maybe you already have a bike messenger-style bag in the closet somewhere, but if you normally have a briefcase or purse in hand, where are you going to put it? How professional is it to walk into a corporate meeting with a bike pannier slung over your shoulder? And it’s raining again. Do you have a weatherproof jacket?

Rain pants? Overshoes? Water-resistant gloves? I’ve seen people on bikes with umbrellas, but it doesn’t look easy, and then how are you going to answer your mobile phone? Or more relevantly, use the brakes?

No, if you want to be part of the new, green world of change and maybe drop a kilo or so, your task is not to step out of your solid, 4-wheels-on-the-pavement vehicle and throw your leg over a wobbly 10-speed that pitches your head forward and your ass in the air. Instead, your mission this: just walk. Many of the amenities that make a city a great place to bicycle, will work for pedestrians, too, like traffic-calming landscaping or the Rails to Trails paths that are for walkers or bicyclists. A 2007 survey in the United States found that when non-bicyclists were asked if they would like to bicycle more, 67% said no, there were too many cars or hills or it seemed generally unsafe. By contrast, people who walked at least 10 minutes a week were twice as likely as bikers to say it was very easy to walk where they lived. It’s true, as long as there’s a sidewalk, it’s pretty easy. If it is a wide, evenly paved, unobstructed sidewalk it’s very easy. Add some pedestrian-friendly trees to provide distance from the traffic and an attractive environment along the way with small views, inviting architecture, welcoming homes or storefronts and it is downright pleasant.

Just do it. Walk.

So start small. Pick an easy walking destination. If it’s raining, drive to work, but if its not, walk from your house to the bus stop and then from the bus stop to your workplace. If you have a few errands to run, park in one place and walk to the rest, starting with the store where you’ll have the smallest and lightest purchases. If you’re going to a dense area of a city, be part of the new frugality of 2009. Instead of driving directly into the parking garage of the museum, theatre or department store, find a free or inexpensive parking spot at the fringe of the downtown area, and walk to your destination. Above all, don’t make yourself miserable. If you have heavy packages or your kids don’t look like they’re going to cooperate, then drive this time and walk when you’re just picking up a few things or you find yourself kid-free for a few hours. After a while, destinations that are a bit farther away may seem attractive, but too time-consuming to walk to. These are the places to consider for a trial bike trip, but only on the next dry, sunny opportunity, and only if you think the traffic and hills will not be overwhelming. If it seems doable, try it out, maybe a few times, because while its true that you never forget how to ride a bike, you definitely forget the feeling. Getting on a bike after years with your feet on the ground or the gas pedal can be a freaky, unstable experience. If you don’t like it, don’t do it.

Walking is the entry drug for car-free transportation and there’s no need to step up to the cocaine of bicycling. Ever. Walking can be a life-long option and bicycling may not be. By walking, you can go just about anywhere; on bike, nearly everywhere; and in a car, only where there is a legal roadway. Although bicycling can deliver you at your destination awake and energized, you may also finish your journey soaking wet, lightly sprinkled with drops of mud, sweaty, and absolutely inappropriately attired. Walking means you can wear your normal clothes (although you may want to bring a change of shoes), carry your normal bag or briefcase, travel at your own pace, rather than that dictated by traffic and your gearing system, and look like a regular person when you arrive. There will be downsides. You’ll find out your shoes are too hard or your umbrella is too flimsy. As I said, don’t make yourself unhappy. Do it when it pleases you. Do it when you have time. But just do it. Just walk.

Chris Tachibana

Chris Tachibana is a science writer at http://chris.tachibana.googlepages.com

Bookmark and Share

Advertisements

8 Responses

  1. OK, sure, he is sort of right about walking but there are real drawbacks to cycling (e.g. it’s too fast to see fine detail) so I am not sure if his attempt at humor works for me as it is chock full of ridiculous stereotypes. (And if you walk you can get more wet if its raining, and just as sweaty.)

    Maybe funny for the in-crowd but those people are already walking. The “cyclists” will have the same opinion as me and us sustainable intermodalists are wondering why there is no mention of collective public transportation.

    But back to walking, e.g. “all you need is a SIDEwalk”. Blech, this North American perspective puts a bad taste in my mouth.

    • Hey Todd,

      Thanks for the reading and thanks for the feedback. I agree that walking is definitely the best way to see weird stuff along the way and it’s easier to get started walking than cycling. Public transport may be the best combination of fast and comfortable, but I’m impatient about waiting for trains and buses.

      I’m kind of new to writing and posting so I’m not sure what you mean by “SIDEwalk” being too North American. Is the term or the implication that one can’t walk down a street unless there’s a sidewalk?

      Walk on!

      Chris

  2. I am European and find this article inspiring to convince my colleagues to walk.

    I am a “walker”, rather than a “cyclist”, but I think all alternatives belong to the same family…

  3. Patrick: If your colleagues would find this so valuable – I assume you mean that they are “walking-as-commuting virgins” – then I still worry about all the negative stuff it says about cycling and how this will be viewed by people who are either uneducated or unactualized, so make sure it is part of a comprehensive mentoring programme 🙂

    Even professional sustainable transport advocates get blinded to modes other than the one which they spend the bulk of their energy on promoting, one typical example being cycling advocates who are unwilling to confront the hegemony of cars and so don’t seem to even notice when new cycle paths are built on walking or “life between buildings” space.

  4. I assume you haven’t been to Portland. Its bicycling activist community is certainly the strongest and biggest (or at least the loudest, most self-aware) per capita among US cities. But I live here, and I assure you that this is very far from a cycling-friendly town. Most of our metro population is suburban, and 99.9 percent of our bike roads are puny “bike lanes” running alongside auto roadways, with no barriers for protection. If Portland were half as bike-friendly as its reputation, we would really be newsworthy.

    Don’t believe the hype.

  5. I like the idea of walking as the entry drug, and I don’t think that people have to eventually add bicycling to their car-free lifestyle, but:

    – Since a comfortable biking speed is 4 to 5 times faster than a comfortable walking speed, the use of a bicycle opens up a much wider number of trips within the same period of time.

    – Most US households already have a bike (2001 NHTS data shows that there 0.86 bicycles per household, recognizing some of us own several), so many trips on good weather days wouldn’t require buying anything new, although it might require a tune-up.

    Clearly it doesn’t make much sense for someone to jump immediately from a lifestyle where all trips are made by car to one where all trips are made by bike.

    Instead, people should consider walking for some of their shorter trips, then maybe pull out their bike or bus schedule and take a few trips by bike and transit, gradually realizing that many of their trips can be made without a car, buying a bus pass and a city or cargo bike in due time if they decide it’s worth it.

    Regardless, nice post and a good way of clarifying that car-free shouldn’t just mean bike.

  6. Thanks Patrick! Yes, bicycling and transit are great ways to extend one’s range after moving from a car to walking. It looks like the Segway wants to be included, too:

    http://www.slate.com/id/2222487/pagenum/all/

    Given their size, I’m not sure many pedestrians will accept them on the sidewalk, however, and given their speed, I doubt that bicyclists and drivers will accept them on the roads.

  7. also happy to read-read blog
    always successful

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: